Recent Posts
- Thought-provoking article re meaning of legal conservatismThe Danger of Trump’s Clash with the Conservative Legal MovementArticle Source FOR…
- Interesting liberal piece mentioning Federalist Society role in Federal judicial pipelineSource: The smartest people in Trumpland – ThinkProgress All of this drama…
- Scalia’s greatest strength, his steadfastness, was also his greatest weakness – The Washington PostI do not agree that his steadfastness as described in the article…
Florida Practice Areas
- Appellate Law
- Charter School Law
- Procurements & Bid Protests
- Professional & Occupational Licensing & Discipline
- Constitutional Law
- Education Law
- School Choice Law
- Business and Civil Litigation
- General Counsel Services
- Election and Campaign Law
- Ethics, Public Records, and Government in the Sunshine Law
- Other Practice Areas
Legal Disclaimer
Justice Scalia’s Legacy
This weekend we lost an Honorable man, a great Jurist, and a true Champion of the Constitution, with the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia. To a large extent, Scalia’s insistence that the Constitution must be understood as it was understood at the time of its adoption, should have been unremarkable. Yet, when he reached the Court 30 years ago, what should have been unremarkable was radical. Over the past 30 years, case by case, often dissent by dissent, he brought the discussion of how the Constitution was to be understood so far, that in the Heller decision, even his liberal colleagues felt compelled to use this framework to discuss the case.
Never let it be said that one person can’t make a difference. Scalia’s life is a testament to the power of one committed individual with wisdom and integrity. Even the discussion about his successor (he can never be replaced) on the Court, and the rancor surrounding the process, bears witness to his legacy in the law.
May those of us in the law saddened by his passing honor his memory by seeking to do our utmost to ensure that his legacy of the rule of law being grounded in a written Constitution is paramount, and not subject to the passing whims and vagaries of popular opinion. A Constitutional right should not exist merely because of the protection of one vote, and I pray that in my lifetime we will see the Supreme Court strengthened in this regard even more than during Scalia’s tenure, although I fear this may not be the case.
Blog Archive
- June 2025 (1)
- August 2017 (1)
- February 2016 (3)
- December 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- May 2012 (1)
- September 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (3)
- December 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (2)
- September 2010 (3)
- July 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (3)
- March 2010 (2)
- December 2009 (3)
- November 2009 (3)
- October 2009 (5)
- September 2009 (12)
- August 2009 (1)

