<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Legal Conservative &#187; presuit notice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/tag/presuit-notice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog</link>
	<description>A discussion of law and cases from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Interesting 1st DCA case &#8211; presuit notice requirements: most interesting part is discussion of internet citation</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/interesting-1st-dca-case-internet-citation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/interesting-1st-dca-case-internet-citation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board certified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet citation in opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition for certiorari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presuit notice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the First DCA  issued an opinion in Oken v. Williams, 1D08-3398, granting a petition for cert in case that argued that the trial court had failed to follow the law when denying a motion to dismiss for failure to comply with presuit notice in a medical malpractice action.  Basically, the plaintiff was attempting to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/interesting-1st-dca-case-internet-citation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
