<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Legal Conservative &#187; outrage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/tag/outrage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog</link>
	<description>A discussion of law and cases from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sansom&#8217;s Motion to Dismiss Official Misconduct Charge Granted</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/sansoms-motions-to-dismiss-official-miscondduct-charges-granted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/sansoms-motions-to-dismiss-official-miscondduct-charges-granted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grand jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[official misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perjury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sansom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Trial &#124;Judge Issued his ruling to day on the Sansom official misconduct charges, and dismissed them, leaving only a perjury charge based on Sansom stating that the College had requested the increase in funds and the state contradicting that testimony.Sansom Order Dismissing Official Misconduct.  As we previously noted, the arguments to dismiss were not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/sansoms-motions-to-dismiss-official-miscondduct-charges-granted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

