<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Legal Conservative &#187; mandatory insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/tag/mandatory-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog</link>
	<description>A discussion of law and cases from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Experts Split on State Lawsuits Over Health Care Law &#8211; NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/experts-split-on-state-lawsuits-over-health-care-law-nytimes-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/experts-split-on-state-lawsuits-over-health-care-law-nytimes-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wickard v. Filburn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts Split on State Lawsuits Over Health Care Law &#8211; NYTimes.com.
Will have to give the times their due, this is a more reasoned explanation of the key issues in the case then most analysis I have seen by the Times.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/experts-split-on-state-lawsuits-over-health-care-law-nytimes-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David B. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A. Casey: Mandatory Insurance Is Unconstitutional &#8211; WSJ.com</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/david-b-rivkin-jr-and-lee-a-casey-mandatory-insurance-is-unconstitutional-wsj-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/david-b-rivkin-jr-and-lee-a-casey-mandatory-insurance-is-unconstitutional-wsj-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax vs regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David B. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A. Casey: Mandatory Insurance Is Unconstitutional &#8211; WSJ.com.
Newest  article from WSJ discussing constitutionality of  mandatory insurance.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/david-b-rivkin-jr-and-lee-a-casey-mandatory-insurance-is-unconstitutional-wsj-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
