<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Legal Conservative &#187; healthcare law suit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/tag/healthcare-law-suit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog</link>
	<description>A discussion of law and cases from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Breaking: Eleventh Circuit Rules Obamacare&#8217;s Individual Mandate is Unconstitutional &#8211; Forbes</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/breaking-eleventh-circuit-rules-obamacares-individual-mandate-is-unconstitutional-forbes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/breaking-eleventh-circuit-rules-obamacares-individual-mandate-is-unconstitutional-forbes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking: Eleventh Circuit Rules Obamacare&#8217;s Individual Mandate is Unconstitutional &#8211; Forbes.
This is a 300 pg. opinion, so more comments to follow.  11th Circuit decision on Constitutionality of Healthcare 
Nice Quotes:
In sum, the individual mandate is breathtaking in its expansive scope. It
regulates those who have not entered the health care market at all. It regulates
those who [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/breaking-eleventh-circuit-rules-obamacares-individual-mandate-is-unconstitutional-forbes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Health Care Lawsuit Update</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/florida-health-care-lawsuit-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/florida-health-care-lawsuit-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mccollum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, as I write this, the arguments are underway in federal court in Pensacola on the cross motions for summary judgment in the case challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare.  For those of you following this case closely, attached are the parties motions and responses that are being argued today:   Plaintiffs MSJ-Memo; Plaintiffs MSJREPLY ; Plaintiffs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/florida-health-care-lawsuit-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key count in health care lawsuit survives motion to dismiss</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/key-count-in-health-care-lawsuit-survives-motion-to-dismiss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/key-count-in-health-care-lawsuit-survives-motion-to-dismiss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Judge Vinson issued his order on President Obama&#8217;s motion to dismiss in the health care lawsuit that Florida and other states have filed in the northern district. The key count, the unconstitutionality of the individual mandate requiring purchase of health care or a penalty survived, as did a coercion count in regard to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/key-count-in-health-care-lawsuit-survives-motion-to-dismiss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on Constitutionality of Healthcare Lawsuit -DOJ Response</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/update-on-constitutionality-of-health-care-lawsuit-doj-response/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/update-on-constitutionality-of-health-care-lawsuit-doj-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregate effect on commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion to dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Government had just filed its motion to dismiss and memo of law in support in the case Attorney General McCollum filed in the Northern District of Florida, Case No. 3: 1 O-cv-91-RV/EMT.  The memo of law is here DOJ MTD Memo 55-1.  Analysis of the points raised in the motion will follow.
The Federal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/update-on-constitutionality-of-health-care-lawsuit-doj-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amended complaint filed in Florida Challenge to Healthcare Act</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/amended-complaint-filed-in-florida-challenge-to-healthcare-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/amended-complaint-filed-in-florida-challenge-to-healthcare-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 21:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mccollum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here it is &#8211; weekend reading, the amended complaint filed by Attorney General Bill McCollum in the challenge to the constitutionality of the health care act.  Analysis to follow.   AMENDED COMPLAINT FINAL Date Stamped 051410
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/amended-complaint-filed-in-florida-challenge-to-healthcare-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experts Split on State Lawsuits Over Health Care Law &#8211; NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/experts-split-on-state-lawsuits-over-health-care-law-nytimes-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/experts-split-on-state-lawsuits-over-health-care-law-nytimes-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wickard v. Filburn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts Split on State Lawsuits Over Health Care Law &#8211; NYTimes.com.
Will have to give the times their due, this is a more reasoned explanation of the key issues in the case then most analysis I have seen by the Times.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/experts-split-on-state-lawsuits-over-health-care-law-nytimes-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

