<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Legal Conservative &#187; constitutional requirement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/tag/constitutional-requirement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog</link>
	<description>A discussion of law and cases from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Breaking: Eleventh Circuit Rules Obamacare&#8217;s Individual Mandate is Unconstitutional &#8211; Forbes</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/breaking-eleventh-circuit-rules-obamacares-individual-mandate-is-unconstitutional-forbes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/breaking-eleventh-circuit-rules-obamacares-individual-mandate-is-unconstitutional-forbes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking: Eleventh Circuit Rules Obamacare&#8217;s Individual Mandate is Unconstitutional &#8211; Forbes.
This is a 300 pg. opinion, so more comments to follow.  11th Circuit decision on Constitutionality of Healthcare 
Nice Quotes:
In sum, the individual mandate is breathtaking in its expansive scope. It
regulates those who have not entered the health care market at all. It regulates
those who [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/breaking-eleventh-circuit-rules-obamacares-individual-mandate-is-unconstitutional-forbes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Health Care Lawsuit Update</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/florida-health-care-lawsuit-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/florida-health-care-lawsuit-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mccollum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, as I write this, the arguments are underway in federal court in Pensacola on the cross motions for summary judgment in the case challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare.  For those of you following this case closely, attached are the parties motions and responses that are being argued today:   Plaintiffs MSJ-Memo; Plaintiffs MSJREPLY ; Plaintiffs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/florida-health-care-lawsuit-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key count in health care lawsuit survives motion to dismiss</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/key-count-in-health-care-lawsuit-survives-motion-to-dismiss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/key-count-in-health-care-lawsuit-survives-motion-to-dismiss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Judge Vinson issued his order on President Obama&#8217;s motion to dismiss in the health care lawsuit that Florida and other states have filed in the northern district. The key count, the unconstitutionality of the individual mandate requiring purchase of health care or a penalty survived, as did a coercion count in regard to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/key-count-in-health-care-lawsuit-survives-motion-to-dismiss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David B. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A. Casey: Mandatory Insurance Is Unconstitutional &#8211; WSJ.com</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/david-b-rivkin-jr-and-lee-a-casey-mandatory-insurance-is-unconstitutional-wsj-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/david-b-rivkin-jr-and-lee-a-casey-mandatory-insurance-is-unconstitutional-wsj-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax vs regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David B. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A. Casey: Mandatory Insurance Is Unconstitutional &#8211; WSJ.com.
Newest  article from WSJ discussing constitutionality of  mandatory insurance.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/david-b-rivkin-jr-and-lee-a-casey-mandatory-insurance-is-unconstitutional-wsj-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

