<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Legal Conservative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog</link>
	<description>A discussion of law and cases from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 21:08:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Individual Mandate: 2 Lawyers Debate Constitutionality: Introduction</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/individual-mandate-2-lawyers-debate-constitutionality-introduction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/individual-mandate-2-lawyers-debate-constitutionality-introduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 21:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Individual Mandate: 2 Lawyers Debate Constitutionality: Introduction.
First of three articles I have the privilege to write for Medscape to cover the healthcare lawsuit argued topics. Note, you may have to do a free sign up to access the articles.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/individual-mandate-2-lawyers-debate-constitutionality-introduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nice Background on Florida Solicitor General Scott Makar</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/nice-background-on-florida-solicitor-general-scott-makar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/nice-background-on-florida-solicitor-general-scott-makar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Certain Appeal &#124;&#124; Gulf Coast Business Review &#124; Tampa Bay, Bradenton, Sarasota, Fort Myers, Naples.
Interesting read on the background of a friend, Solicitor General Scott Makar.  I believe at this point he is the longest serving Florida Solicitor General.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/nice-background-on-florida-solicitor-general-scott-makar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking: Eleventh Circuit Rules Obamacare&#8217;s Individual Mandate is Unconstitutional &#8211; Forbes</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/breaking-eleventh-circuit-rules-obamacares-individual-mandate-is-unconstitutional-forbes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/breaking-eleventh-circuit-rules-obamacares-individual-mandate-is-unconstitutional-forbes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking: Eleventh Circuit Rules Obamacare&#8217;s Individual Mandate is Unconstitutional &#8211; Forbes.
This is a 300 pg. opinion, so more comments to follow.  11th Circuit decision on Constitutionality of Healthcare 
Nice Quotes:
In sum, the individual mandate is breathtaking in its expansive scope. It
regulates those who have not entered the health care market at all. It regulates
those who [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/breaking-eleventh-circuit-rules-obamacares-individual-mandate-is-unconstitutional-forbes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Trippe&#8217;s litigation experience serves him well as Gov. Rick Scott&#8217;s top attorney &#8211; St. Petersburg Times</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/charles-trippes-litigation-experience-serves-him-well-as-gov-rick-scotts-top-attorney-st-petersburg-times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/charles-trippes-litigation-experience-serves-him-well-as-gov-rick-scotts-top-attorney-st-petersburg-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trippe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting piece on the Governor&#8217;s General Counsel for those interested in learning more about who is now advising Governor Scott on Judicial Selection.
Charles Trippe&#8217;s litigation experience serves him well as Gov. Rick Scott&#8217;s top attorney &#8211; St. Petersburg Times.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/charles-trippes-litigation-experience-serves-him-well-as-gov-rick-scotts-top-attorney-st-petersburg-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare Lawsuit- Judge strikes entire act based on individual mandate- but finds no merit to the Medicaid claim</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/healthcare-lawsuit-judge-strikes-entire-act-based-on-individual-mandate-but-finds-no-merit-to-the-medicaid-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/healthcare-lawsuit-judge-strikes-entire-act-based-on-individual-mandate-but-finds-no-merit-to-the-medicaid-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not severable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vinson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking news, decision just came down.  Analysis to follow. vinson-ruling
Excerpt from the opinion:
For the reasons stated, I must reluctantly conclude that Congress exceeded
the bounds of its authority in passing the Act with the individual mandate. That is
not to say, of course, that Congress is without power to address the problems and
inequities in our health care [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/healthcare-lawsuit-judge-strikes-entire-act-based-on-individual-mandate-but-finds-no-merit-to-the-medicaid-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where judicial activism morphs into disregard</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/where-judicial-activism-morphs-into-disregard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/where-judicial-activism-morphs-into-disregard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disregard for the law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ninth circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shameless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where judicial activism morphs into disregard.
Interesting article. The Ninth Circuit is maintaining its role as the most reversed circuit. Some excerpts below:

Four times this month the U.S. Supreme Court has slapped down the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Four times the Big Bench unanimously reversed Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decisions. Unanimous is a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/where-judicial-activism-morphs-into-disregard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Allows Emanuel on Ballot for Chicago Mayor &#8211; NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/court-allows-emanuel-on-ballot-for-chicago-mayor-nytimes-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/court-allows-emanuel-on-ballot-for-chicago-mayor-nytimes-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apellate error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appellate error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judical activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precedent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rahm emanuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settled law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Court Allows Emanuel on Ballot for Chicago Mayor &#8211; NYTimes.com.
This is an interesting decision, written by a court that appeared intent on chastising the lower appellate tribunal.  If the supreme court analysis of Illinois law was correct, this is a classic case of judicial activism.  Opinion here: Rahm
Some excerpts from the decision below:
Before proceeding to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/court-allows-emanuel-on-ballot-for-chicago-mayor-nytimes-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Health Care Lawsuit Update</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/florida-health-care-lawsuit-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/florida-health-care-lawsuit-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mccollum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, as I write this, the arguments are underway in federal court in Pensacola on the cross motions for summary judgment in the case challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare.  For those of you following this case closely, attached are the parties motions and responses that are being argued today:   Plaintiffs MSJ-Memo; Plaintiffs MSJREPLY ; Plaintiffs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/florida-health-care-lawsuit-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreclosure Defenses- A Conservative Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/foreclosure-defenses-a-conservative-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/foreclosure-defenses-a-conservative-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic free ride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robo-signers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal has an article today about the attorneys who have done some of the litigation and discovery that has uncovered alleged &#8220;robo-signers.  Clearly, there is no excuse if employees of the banks have made false representations in documents, but this issue begs the question of the impact any misrepresentations should have on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/foreclosure-defenses-a-conservative-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key count in health care lawsuit survives motion to dismiss</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/key-count-in-health-care-lawsuit-survives-motion-to-dismiss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/key-count-in-health-care-lawsuit-survives-motion-to-dismiss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Judge Vinson issued his order on President Obama&#8217;s motion to dismiss in the health care lawsuit that Florida and other states have filed in the northern district. The key count, the unconstitutionality of the individual mandate requiring purchase of health care or a penalty survived, as did a coercion count in regard to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/key-count-in-health-care-lawsuit-survives-motion-to-dismiss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
