<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Legal Conservative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog</link>
	<description>A discussion of law and cases from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Update on Constitutionality of Healthcare Lawsuit -DOJ Response</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/update-on-constitutionality-of-health-care-lawsuit-doj-response/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/update-on-constitutionality-of-health-care-lawsuit-doj-response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregate effect on commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion to dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern District]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Government had just filed its motion to dismiss and memo of law in support in the case Attorney General McCollum filed in the Northern District of Florida, Case No. 3: 1 O-cv-91-RV/EMT.  The memo of law is here DOJ MTD Memo 55-1.  Analysis of the points raised in the motion will follow.
The Federal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/update-on-constitutionality-of-health-care-lawsuit-doj-response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Ruling in Graham: Life Without Parole for Juvenile</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/supreme-court-ruling-in-graham-life-without-parole-for-juvenile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/supreme-court-ruling-in-graham-life-without-parole-for-juvenile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 19:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolving standards of decency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juvenile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life without parole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speechless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having just read this decision, and the evolution of the evolving standards of decency and proportionality review, in addition to the first ever time that I remember the court completing a social study that was cited  by a party, and using it to justify the holding in the case- all I can say is wow- [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/supreme-court-ruling-in-graham-life-without-parole-for-juvenile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amended complaint filed in Florida Challenge to Healthcare Act</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/amended-complaint-filed-in-florida-challenge-to-healthcare-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/amended-complaint-filed-in-florida-challenge-to-healthcare-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 21:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mccollum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here it is &#8211; weekend reading, the amended complaint filed by Attorney General Bill McCollum in the challenge to the constitutionality of the health care act.  Analysis to follow.   AMENDED COMPLAINT FINAL Date Stamped 051410
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/amended-complaint-filed-in-florida-challenge-to-healthcare-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experts Split on State Lawsuits Over Health Care Law &#8211; NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/experts-split-on-state-lawsuits-over-health-care-law-nytimes-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/experts-split-on-state-lawsuits-over-health-care-law-nytimes-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wickard v. Filburn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts Split on State Lawsuits Over Health Care Law &#8211; NYTimes.com.
Will have to give the times their due, this is a more reasoned explanation of the key issues in the case then most analysis I have seen by the Times.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/experts-split-on-state-lawsuits-over-health-care-law-nytimes-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit filed by McCollum Challenging Constitutionality of Healthcare Legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/lawsuit-filed-by-mccollum-challenging-constitutionality-of-healthcare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/lawsuit-filed-by-mccollum-challenging-constitutionality-of-healthcare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mccollum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powers reserved to states or people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxing and spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfunded mandate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/lawsuit-filed-by-mccollum-challenging-constitutionality-of-healthcare/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attached is a copy of the suit just filed challenging the constitutionality of President Obama&#8217;s Health Care Legislation.  Analysis to follow, but wanted to get the suit up immediately, it has been filed in Federal Court in the Northern District of Florida.  Healthcare Unconstitutional COMPLAINT (03-23)
Ok, having had time to review the complaint, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/lawsuit-filed-by-mccollum-challenging-constitutionality-of-healthcare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogger Status Update</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/blogger-status-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/blogger-status-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/blogger-status-update/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of you may have wondered whether there would be anymore updates, and the answer is yes- there are plenty of interesting matters to cover. For the past two months I just was caught up in some major client projects- do have to pay the bills after all, and as the father of 4 month [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/blogger-status-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on Sansom Odom Appeal 1st DCA opinion 09-5158</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/update-on-sansom-odom-appeal-ist-dca-opinion-09-5158/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/update-on-sansom-odom-appeal-ist-dca-opinion-09-5158/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1st DCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interlocutory appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[official misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perjury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sansom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well if you remember the October 15th Post on the Motion to Dismiss charges against Sansom and Odom, we predicted the odds of a reversal on appeal would be slim, and the IST DCA has just turned down the appeal as to Sansom and Odom as one that that State had no jurisdiction to file.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/update-on-sansom-odom-appeal-ist-dca-opinion-09-5158/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ist DCA issues ruling in Prison Ministries Case- Finds Plaintiffs have stated a Claim</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/ist-dca-issues-ruling-in-prison-ministries-case-finds-plaintiffs-have-stated-a-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/ist-dca-issues-ruling-in-prison-ministries-case-finds-plaintiffs-have-stated-a-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush v. holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith based prision ministries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith based services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[halfway houses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relious liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sectarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[substance abuse treatment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning the First DCA  issued its decision in  08-4713 COUNCIL FOR SECULAR HUMANSIM, INC., RICHARD HULL and ELAINE HULL, v. WALTER A. MCNEIL, in his official capacity as Secretary of Corrections of Florida: PRISONERS OF CHRIST, INC., a Florida corporation; and LAMB OF GOD MINISTRIES, INC., Florida corporation. The Court basically reversed the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/ist-dca-issues-ruling-in-prison-ministries-case-finds-plaintiffs-have-stated-a-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selective Empathy &#8211; Opinionator Blog &#8211; NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/selective-empathy-opinionator-blog-nytimes-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/selective-empathy-opinionator-blog-nytimes-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Selective Empathy &#8211; Opinionator Blog &#8211; NYTimes.com.
Greenhouse has some interesting thoughts about a very unusual per curiam opinion that was issued by the U. S. Supreme Court in a Florida ineffective assistance of counsel  capital case, Porter, this week.  Basically, the court said that failure to present evidence at the sentencing portion of the trial [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/selective-empathy-opinionator-blog-nytimes-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Landowners along Florida beaches ask Supreme Court to examine taking of private property &#8211; washingtonpost.com</title>
		<link>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/landowners-along-florida-beaches-ask-supreme-court-to-examine-taking-of-private-property-washingtonpost-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/landowners-along-florida-beaches-ask-supreme-court-to-examine-taking-of-private-property-washingtonpost-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodring Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beach renourishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial taking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral argument]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Landowners along Florida beaches ask Supreme Court to examine taking of private property &#8211; washingtonpost.com.   Good high level analysis of the takings case that will be heard by the Supreme Court December 2- I will be in DC that Day but am speaking during the OA and unfortunately will not be able to attend- it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.woodringlawfirm.com/legal_conservative_blog/landowners-along-florida-beaches-ask-supreme-court-to-examine-taking-of-private-property-washingtonpost-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
